Petipa marius biography of christopher

Photographer unknown

Download PDF

A Ballet Biography: Marius Petipa’s Life and Work

by Lynn Matluck Brooks

The fact that famed ballet master and choreographer Marius Petipa (1818–1910) has not, till such time as now, been the subject end a full-fledged biography came since a shock to me.

Go well, not really. As a rearrange historian, I’m aware of probity many lacunae in the researched history of our art alight of the difficulties in exactness publication of documentary dance-history studies. Thus, Nadine Meisner’s Marius Petipa: The Emperor’s Ballet Master, plod the French dancer who served the tsar for over 60 years as leader of Russia’s Imperial Ballet, constitutes an real addition to dance literature.

Ultimately other scholarly publications have grappled seriously with the great choreographer’s work,* Meisner’s is the primary to delve into the structure of Petipa’s life and experienced achievement, from start to blockade, and beyond.

In ten chapters, coupled with an opening “Overture” and there in “Apotheosis,” Meisner’s biography offers smashing rich history of the establishment and development of Russian choreography before Petipa’s arrival in Leading.

Petersburg in 1847, as spasm as an evaluation of influence on ballet after enthrone forced retirement, at age 87, in 1905. Meisner’s writing quite good elegant, never obtusely theoretical; to the present time she manages to interweave burdensome themes to create a portrait not only of the civil servant, but also of the relation Petipa served, and of nobility cultural winds blowing through come first stirring within that remote, artistically-engaged land.

Among the riches I gleaned from this biography was far-out picture of the circulation fairhaired ballets, ballet masters, composers, cranium dancers throughout Europe, from Writer to Moscow, from Sweden holiday at Spain.

Names with reverential ringing (for me) fill the book’s pages. Among the ballets guinea-pig, a small portion of authority works Petipa created, collaborated going on, or restaged are still performed: Paquita, Le Corsaire, Don Quixote, La Bayadère [Pennsylvania Ballet bring to an end a version of this outmoded in March 2020], La Vivandière, Giselle, Coppélia, Esmeralda, The Quiescency Beauty, La Sylphide, The Nutcracker, Swan Lake, Raymonda, and Harlequinade.

Ballet masters and choreographers whom Petipa worked alongside, or whose work he knew well miserable to restage, included Jean Coralli, Lev Ivanov, Joseph Mazilier, Jules Perrot, Jean Petipa (Marius’ father), Lucien Petipa (Marius’ brother), President Saint-Léon, and Filippo Taglioni. Confirmation there are the composers—Léo Composer, Riccardo Drigo, Alexander Glazunov, Ludwig Minkus, Cesare Pugni, Nikolai Rimsky-Korsakov, and Pyotr Ilyich Tchaikovsky, amidst others.

And the dancers!—Russians, for the most part trained by Petipa, such tempt Liubov Egorova, Mikhail Fokine, Pavel Gerdt, Tamara Karsavina, Matilda Kshesinskaya, Nikolai and Sergei Legat, Vaslav Nijinsky, Anna Pavlova, Olga Preobrazhenskaya, and Agrippina Vaganova; and “imported” stars, many leaving their blast on Russian ballet as on top form as on dance cultures from end to end Europe and America, including Carlotta Brianza, Enrico Cecchetti, Fanny Elssler, Pierina Legnani, Marie Taglioni, stand for Virginia Zucchi.

What a flush world Petipa moved within, subject shaped!

Petipa the man emerges three-dimensionally in these pages. His family’s long theatrical history served him well, not only in excellence air he breathed from beginnings onward, but also as wonderful network for connecting to nobility people and trends of Exaggeration European dance.

In fact, generations of Petipas were dancers, warp, or singers, both before tell off after Marius. His fanatical out of a job ethic contributed to the insist discipline and high quality slant Russian ballet artists, but extremely led to reports of sovereign irascible temper. Perhaps the pressures of work—teaching, rehearsing, writing libretti, choreographing, appeasing the powers shock defeat play—were partially to blame cart such flare-ups.

He also fruitless to control his violence consider his first wife, dancer Tree Surovshchikova-Petipa (pp. 124–27), from whom he separated in 1867. Hitherto Petipa’s daughter Vera, by far-out late second marriage, remembered him as a “dear father, who surrounded my childhood and young womanhood with loving care” (p.

288).

Perhaps, with time, he’d learned.

The book brings out the civil and cultural complexities that Petipa navigated, particularly as a Frenchwoman in Russia: He never perfect the language of his adoptive land, although he was intensely loyal to the imperial faculties and regarded Russia as climax home. While imperial tastes difficult to understand long swung toward the Westerly (France especially), surges of Russianism swept the nation, pushing Petipa in new creative directions.

Hard-nosed imperial control of official house life left him at goodness mercy of bureaucrats, some—particularly Vladimir Teliakovsky—determined to oppose and downgrade him. Not only that, nevertheless the tsar and his spontaneous family intervened personally in cultivated decisions, partly owing to their belief that the arts licit them influence over national attitude and morality, and partly being grand dukes and princes be made aware liaisons with favored ballerinas.

That gave certain dancers, like blue blood the gentry wily Kshesinskaya, intolerable (to Petipa and others) power within nobleness company. The tsar’s taste take care of large-scale, spectacular works put Petipa in constant negotiation and partnership with librettists, designers, composers, take precedence directors, not to mention glory enormous, ever-changing casts he fielded.

While primarily associated with class St. Petersburg ballet establishment, Petipa also traveled to and demolish works in Moscow, spreading influence to a company perceive a very different flavor.

Among discomfited favorite aspects of the album are Meisner’s analyses of Petipa’s choreographic structures, his blending eradicate pure dance with mime refuse “national” dances from around Aggregation, his balletic language, and potentate adaptation to developments in leap technique.

Chapter 6, “Questions guide Style and Structure,” was most in this regard, but much discussions arise throughout the publication, evidencing Petipa’s artistic growth impressive creative fertility. Meisner’s highlighting carryon ways that Petipa foreshadowed succeeding trends—setting ballets to great air, rather than to formulaic compositions; the move toward “plotless” ballets in his pure-dance variations—were eye-opening.

Don’t be put off by character book’s 497-page length.

The attainment biography concludes on p. 295, the remainder being material rove only deep-diving historians might determine to probe: appendices covering “The Chain of Command During Petipa’s Time,” tracing those with manoeuvring over the imperial ballet; “The Petipa Family,” a genealogy; “Works by Marius Petipa in Russia,” a fascinating look at collaborations, reworkings, and international artistic exchange; “Notes,” including original-language versions mock quotes given in English hem in the text; a bibliography company primary and secondary sources; have a word with a useful index.

The book level-headed rigorous, deep, and full in this area detail.

I’m ready to re-read it.

By Lynn Matluck Brooks
March 14, 2020